Fat Elephant

Fat Elephant

WEF Wants to Monetize the Air We Breathe

M Dowling

The WEF is looking for a way to monetize the air we breathe, the soil we use to plant, and the water we need to survive.

The World Economic Forum wants to control Earth’s people this way. This ridiculous woman in the clip below thinks the arrogant people at the WEF should control the world’s water, soil, and oxygen after they put it on the books as a financial asset. It is something else they can tax and tariff.

The concern is that this radical, insane organization is now taken seriously and uses it to further extreme climate change policies. She is hard to listen to, so I included a transcript after the clip.

Watch:

Transcript

“When we talk about capital, we tend to think only about financial capital, about cash, financial assets. But we know that’s not the only value on which our economies depend.

“We know that every aspect of every part of the economy is fundamentally dependent on nature, as you highlighted: the air that we breathe, the water we drink, the soil, the oceans that we need for the food that we need to consume, the minerals that we need as inputs to technology and to infrastructure.

“And without these forms of value, these forms of natural capital. We won’t have economies; they are the fundamental building blocks of our economies. But the ways, as you said, the ways in which we have grown our economies, our models of economic development, have been incredibly successful for global prosperity. I mean, but the unintended consequences of current models of growth are simply not sustainable on a finite planet.

“The amount of resources that we are drawing into our economies, Earth’s resources, and the amount of pollution and waste that we’re pumping out, whether that’s through greenhouse gas emissions, whether that’s sewage into our water, whether it’s plastics into the ocean, is beyond the Earth’s carrying capacity.

“And we know that that’s leading, as you said, to very significant direct impacts for society, but very significant financial costs for the economy. We can look at that as you have and calculate that at a macro level. But the way that that’s showing up as we’re breaching these boundaries and breaching these limits and undermining nature is showing up in  very practical ways that are showing up for financial risk for institutions.

“Lack of water is leading to disruption of operations of supply chains where water is needed as an essential input for manufacturing or power production. The degradation of soil is leading to reduced agricultural yields; the decline of pollinator species is also having an impact on agriculture. So that’s leading to direct financial risks for organizations, the businesses, and ultimately for investors.

“And as you said, ultimately the reason for this is that, at the moment, the way that decisions are made on an everyday level within businesses and financial institutions is because we’re looking only at financial data, financial metrics that are not factoring in nature.

“Nature is treated within the economy as though it’s unlimited and predominantly as though it’s free. And the risks and harms are simply not costed in financial terms. We can cost them at a macro level; they’re not costed into day-to-day decision-making, and the result is, as a consequence, we’ve put all of our economies at fundamental risk. We can’t do business on a dead planet. If we’re going to protect natural systems, one of the solutions is to bring nature into the balance sheet. To allocate a value to it. To bring it into accounting and financial mechanisms.”

 

Image: iStock

Gab